Take It Back - Dec - Decnet

I would say thats a perfect review, because it sums up every little effect and element i had in it. Some people tend to listen to the music as a whole, and some people shops up the music or tune in their heads and starts to listen to the small things that makes the difference in the end. Seemes like we have a lot in common (so far:) )

Big thumb up and thanks for the review and ill make sure to return the favor..

///Dec

I shall see what i can do, im currently in process of creating an additional site (not named yet, tho) where i publish .rsn files and specific own-created stuff as loops and well.. The problem here is that my loops are long as hell, because im still a big fan of variation in the loop, witch makes it a "non-loop" if you read through the LUA here on looperman for instance.. So there for there hsnt been any loops-upload on this site from me "yet".. but im working on it. Every tune i have on here is up for grabs tho in its own specific state, so if you can make something out of it as it is by adding, extracting, pitching or whatnot, feel free to do so..

And im also glad that you enjoyed it.. Thank you once again for the comment..

///Dec

That has to be one of my main problems.. Both good and bad i suppose, When creating tunes i always start out creating a loop that sounds aweseom in my ears and to quote Brillbailey in a previous review "I wrapp the rest of the music around the loop". By doing this there is always at least "one sound" or "loop" that follows through the entire tune, making it (if you concentrate on that specific sound) repetetive, BUT at the same time trying to alter it all by using sounds that steals the attention of the main loop..

aaah.. sounds like blabbering jibberish but you are probobly an intelligent being and knows exactly what im talking about.. lol.. anyways.. Thanks for the comment!

///Dec

2 weeks later and heres a reply.. (i NEEEEEED to get faster at replying.. lol.. but blaming it on too much work, too much kids, and my clock seemes to be supercharged and the time just flies...)

Thank you Ed anyway, and i still think this is a great initiative.. Its fun to see that even when quiality suffers and the tune in my ears didnt come out as expected its still audiable to others. Feel good.. thanks again mate..

///Dec

LoL.. Loved the comment.. "aural hypothermia".

Thanks mate ´t made my day.. :)

///Dec

Thanks mate for the analysis.. When i did this tune a lot of things didnt really go as planned, and the only thing that whent with it was the liveplay of the piano. I always record the piano at the side together with the tune itself to make it project emotions, well, my emotions to be exact.. The quality of some of the specific sounds got ruffed up when going from 48k to 22500 and theres a audiable difference when listening to the original on my puter at the correct hertz.. But i hear you, and if i ever bring this tune to life again ill might consider what you said, but for now, this tune is at rest.. so 2 speak..

///Dec

Thank you for the comment.. Its always fun when people can enjoy ones work. If it was chill, im satisfied.. :)

///Dec

Thanks Brill.. I hope i took you on that emotional jurney when listening to the tune. As long as I can publish something more than just a basic drum and commersial fiddle into it, im good.

Emotional touch if you could call it that.. :)

Thanks again Brillbilly. ///Dec

Oh, didnt see these comments until now and i do apolagize for a late response. Thank you for your kind words.. Have to google the word "Meticulous" tho, cuz i dont have a single clue of what it means. lol..

Thank you.. ///Dec

Thank you for the comment!

When it comes to the "sadness" behind the song i often do music thinking of my sons life.. Im glad that you noticed the gloomy appearence of the tune. My sons mother is an alcoholic and most of my tunes never gets published since i try to musicalize his thoughts and what he might be thinking.. Its a rough reality out there, and im just trying to make a beat out of it. /:)