KOSMONAUTEN

listened to I and II back-to-back - this has a great flow and an immense attention to detail in the composition - and the tracks are totally well-realized - clue me in as why you think splitting this into two entities is necessary - really I would like to understand that because the two parts are seamless and the work as a whole is a def fav.

KOSMONAUTEN replied Unknown

MStokes,
Thank you for your kind words; the two tracks were compiled from colossal sessions that were ultimately edited down significantly. The two are essentially seamless in regards to liquidity; the transition from Part I to II is a precipitous cosmic downward transition, hopefully towards transcendence.

Comments (3)